Interview with Optimum Media Solutions executive vice president Amit Ray
 
"Advertisers must remember that every match is not a India-Pakistan match"
Posted on 3 January 2003
 
Mudra's Optimum Media Solutions executive vice president Amit Ray's zest for cricket is matched by his passion for media statistics. Ray, a veteran in the specialist media industry, has worked on some of the blue-chip accounts such the Godrej group, Reliance amongst others.
 
Ray's flair for number-crunching and his understanding of the psychographics and 'emotional' aspects of target audiences and media vehicles has augured well for Optimum Media Solutions. Ray had just landed in Mumbai after a hectic trip to Ahmedabad. He took some time off his busy schedule to catch up with indiantelevision.com's Ashwin Kotian and talk about his twin passions; cricket and media planning!
 
What makes this World Cup different from the previous ones or other cricket tournaments?
The 2003 World Cup cricket (WCC) is different from the 1999 WCC in England and the 1996 WCC in the sub-continent in terms of participating teams, telecast timings, TV penetration etc. In the earlier versions, it was difficult to estimate the overall viewership and spends due to the fact that the administration of the game and usage of the TV medium was not well developed. However, 2003 WCC provides a very strong platform to estimate the diverse aspects of the game, viewerships, spends and behavioural patterns.

Match Timings
1999 England WCC 2003 South Africa WCC
1st Innings 3:30 pm to 7 pm 12:30pm to 4 pm
2nd Innings 7:30 pm to 11pm 4: 30 pm tp 8 pm

Increase in the number of league matches and total matches

1999 England WCC 2003 England WCC Increase
League 30 44 12
Super Six 6 6 Nil
Semis 2 2 Nil
Final 1 1 Nil
Total 39 53 12

The inclusion of two new teams has taken the total number of teams to 14 from 12.

Viwership potential Number 1999 2003
Astronomical 1 India India
High 2 Pakistan Pakistan
3 Australia Australia
4 Sri Lanka Sri Lanka
5 S Africa S Africa
Moderate 6 N. Zealand N. Zealand
7 England England
8 West Indies West Indies
9 Zimbabwe Zimbabwe
Poor/ very poor 10 Bangladesh Bangladesh
Kenya Kenya
Scotland Canada
Holland
Namibia

It is obvious that several matches will not evoke much interest. Having so many teams and more matches is of no real benefit to advertiser vis-à-vis viewership ratings.

To ascertain the level of interest in non-India league matches, the matches can be classified into three clusters

C1 - Test playing nations versus Test playing nations (Australia versus India) C2 - Test playing nation versus non-test playing nation (Australia versus Kenya) C3 - Non-test playing nations versus non-test playing nations (Holland versus Namibia)

All the matches beyond the league stage will be C1 and the classification is relevant only for the league matches.

The day-night matches in 2003 WCC will have higher viewership potential compared to the day matches as the viewership will peak from 6:30 pm onwards. Only one India match will benefit.

Match Class Day/Night Day
India 1 5
Non India
Total 6 30
C1 4 5
C2 21
C3 2 4

Weekend viewing: The weekend viewing will generate more viewership especially as a significant portion of the match will be played during the day. But, there is almost no change vis-à-vis 1999, hence not higher viewership.

Match Class 1999 WCC 2003 WCC
India 3 3
Non India 8 10
Total
C1 3 4
C2 4 4
C3 1 2

Channel penetration: Though the availability and viewership is not directly co-related (if availability is by default then viewership is by choice), still it is safe to assume that MAX will reach almost close to Star Sports proportion (to all C&S homes) as in 1999. This will mean a substantial jump in homes available to MAX. But again, DD is free and the superior quality promised by the DD-Nimbus combine may actually affect either the number of homes which will be able to receive the signals or the people who will actually be watching MAX.

Figs in million Figs in million
1999 IRS 2000 R1 2003 NRS 2002
TV Homes 61.3 81.6
DD Homes 60.9 76.7
C&S Homes 26.9 40.5
Star Sports 16.1 21.8
ESPN 13 16.2
MAX NA 13.7
DD Sports NA 12.1
Ten Sports NA 0.3

Channel promotion: MAX has ventured into the tried and tested additional four hours of 'cricktainment' in addition to the live matches. The readings of the ICC Champions Trophy can be truly representative of the 2003 WCC due to the similarity of timings. Clearly, MAX's promotion of cricktainment worked marginally. The question is "Will the MAX team be able to create and sustain a hype in its forthcoming promotional blitzkrieg?"

Average ratings
Pre match (2 hrs) Matches (excl lunch) Post match (1 hr)
India 1.4 9.3 3.3
C1 0.6 3 0.7
C2 0.5 2.4 0.9
Note: There were no C3 matches in ICC Champions Trophy

 

 

What do you feel about advertisers putting money on cricket?
In India, viewership of cricket has nothing to do with the finer aspects of the game. Fickle-minded audiences love to watch cricket stars; not necessarily the game. The audiences are influenced by populist sentiments. If the audiences loved the game, then Ranji trophy would have been a big draw; the fact is that these Ranji matches are not popular!

Advertisers are putting huge sums of money on cricket despite the fact that India (and some select non-India) matches that can probably get huge viewership are few and far between. The popular hypothesis, supported by research is that decision makers like/enjoy cricket and hence they believe that everyone loves cricket too. The advertisers must remember that every match is not a India-Pakistan match.

Per cent of Indian decision makers (VP/GM upwards)
Name of Sports Who played Who watch sports on TV
Cricket 30 85.7
Badminton 24.6 11.1
Table tennis 20.7 9.8
Swimming 20.7 7.3
Tennis 14.3 56.7
Golf 13.1 15.3
Soccer/football 5 36.1

Decision makers survey

 

What is your opinion about the claims that female viewership for cricket is increasing?
Research on male-female viewership proves that females have always been passive watchers of cricket; always moving around as compared to the males who retire into their comfortable sofas during cricket matches. Female viewers are not as intense as males because they are forced to watch cricket. A majority of women don't fall into "love to watch" but into the "forced to watch" category.

Given a choice, the females would still prefer the soaps in the afternoons and even during the live matches. After the matches, the females will definitely watch the primetime serials. There might be a fatigue factor if one or two matches are engrossing ones and there is a high sense of involvement. Mass entertainment channels such as Star have already accepted the challenge and are trying out new things. The onus is on the sales teams/producers (of the mass entertainment channels) to push/force the audience to sample the different fare that they can dish out during the post match telecasts. The 2003 WCC coverage won't eat into the prime time and will make a mere marginal impact on certain days.

Again, I must say that the 'star-struck' females fans who 'love' watching certain cricketers will exhibit a different behaviour than the above mentioned one.

 
 
"Given a choice, the females would still prefer the soaps in the afternoons and even during the live matches. After the matches, the females will definitely watch the primetime serial"

 
 
Who are your favourites for the 2003 WCC?
Australia, South Africa and New Zealand are strong contenders. But, I feel that a team that has never won the World Cup will win this time. I don't have high hopes from the Indian team because the team, albeit talented, doesn't have good technique. This fallacy was clear during the New Zealand tour. On South African pitches, the ball will rise above waist height and the Indians will find it difficult to score. Being a patriotic Indian, I hope that the Indian team's sheer talent and will-power will override all the negatives and propels it into the final four.

Click for more MAM Interview
 
 
 
 
 

Contact Us | Feedback | About Indiantelevision | Disclaimer
© 2001- 2005 Indian Television Dot Com Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.